- Flexible acquisition solutions can improve azimuth coverage
- The uniformity of offset-azimuth coverage required will determine the cost of the acquisition
- MAZ acquisition is a flexible and cost-effective option, while WAZ/RAZ acquisition requires two or more vessels, and a far greater survey planning effort
The offset-azimuth coverage for MAZ surveys (refer to the center rose diagram below) is characterized by reasonably continuous azimuthal coverage for only the shorter offsets and quite abrupt azimuth contrasts at longer offsets. For complex structural settings compounded by laterally extensive and rugose salt bodies, complex wavefield propagation effects can create complex coherent noise and significant target illumination variations that render conventional imaging workflows quite useless.
High-end shot-domain imaging workflows using reverse time migration (RTM) can be more successful when more uniform offset-azimuth coverage for all offsets is acquired using multi-vessel wide-azimuth configurations or well-sampled ocean bottom node deployments.
In cases where ultra-long offsets, longer than maybe achievable using dual-vessel extended long offset survey designs, are required for FWI to provide the deep models necessary for RTM imaging, a combination streamer-OBN survey strategies may be necessary. This can provide the ultra-long offsets for FWI to high-grade the subsalt imaging, or hybrid streamer-OBN acquisition with the simultaneous deployment of towed-streamer and OBN sensors may yield the necessary offset-azimuth sampling.
In the most challenging scenarios, standalone OBN acquisition with dense OBN spacing, large receiver arrays and significantly larger shot grids represent the most uniformly sampled data platform, though also the most expensive.
Contact a PGS expert
If you have a question related to our Marine Acquisition services or would like to request a quotation, please get in touch.